https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759226 The Calcutta HC dismissed a review petition challenging penalty imposition for non-updation of four e-waybills. The court noted that a coordinate bench had previously considered the case, acknowledging that e-waybills were updated within two minutes of interception and genuine difficulties prevented immediate Part-B compliance. The earlier order had already modified the penalty to Rs. 50,000/- after finding the original order harsh and non-speaking. The court concluded it had not overlooked the non-updation of Part-B of the fourth e-waybill when passing the earlier order. en-us Fri, 23 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 May 2025 21:18:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759226 The Calcutta HC dismissed a review petition challenging penalty imposition for non-updation of four e-waybills. The court noted that a coordinate bench had previously considered the case, acknowledging that e-waybills were updated within two minutes of interception and genuine difficulties prevented immediate Part-B compliance. The earlier order had already modified the penalty to Rs. 50,000/- after finding the original order harsh and non-speaking. The court concluded it had not overlooked the non-updation of Part-B of the fourth e-waybill when passing the earlier order. Case-Laws GST Fri, 23 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759226