<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1480 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759236</link>
    <description>Tax refund application involving discrepancies in invoices and tax filings was rejected by tax authorities. HC found the rejection order untenable, noting insufficient consideration of petitioner&#039;s explanation for erroneous advance payment. Court quashed the rejection order and directed tax authorities to reconsider the refund claim within two months, providing a fair hearing and addressing the petitioner&#039;s clarifications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 May 2025 19:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=770519" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1480 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759236</link>
      <description>Tax refund application involving discrepancies in invoices and tax filings was rejected by tax authorities. HC found the rejection order untenable, noting insufficient consideration of petitioner&#039;s explanation for erroneous advance payment. Court quashed the rejection order and directed tax authorities to reconsider the refund claim within two months, providing a fair hearing and addressing the petitioner&#039;s clarifications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759236</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>