<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1483 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759239</link>
    <description>HC allowed petition challenging non-adjustment of ITC in GSTR-2A where petitioner was issued two different GSTIN against single PAN. Court applied Circular No.183/15/2022-GST and followed precedent from similar factual case holding that benefit of circular issued during pendency of appeal cannot be denied to assessee. Impugned order dated December 22, 2023 was quashed and set aside. Joint Commissioner directed to pass fresh order in terms of the circular. Petition allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 May 2025 16:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=770516" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1483 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759239</link>
      <description>HC allowed petition challenging non-adjustment of ITC in GSTR-2A where petitioner was issued two different GSTIN against single PAN. Court applied Circular No.183/15/2022-GST and followed precedent from similar factual case holding that benefit of circular issued during pendency of appeal cannot be denied to assessee. Impugned order dated December 22, 2023 was quashed and set aside. Joint Commissioner directed to pass fresh order in terms of the circular. Petition allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759239</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>