<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1827 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457696</link>
    <description>Delhi HC set aside an arbitral award that held a non-signatory party liable by piercing the corporate veil. The court ruled that arbitrators lack jurisdiction to lift corporate veils as their authority is limited to parties who consented to arbitration. While courts possess power to pierce corporate veils in appropriate cases, arbitral tribunals cannot extend proceedings to include non-consenting parties outside the arbitration agreement&#039;s scope. The petition was allowed and the award was set aside regarding the petitioner&#039;s liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2024 23:06:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=770512" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1827 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457696</link>
      <description>Delhi HC set aside an arbitral award that held a non-signatory party liable by piercing the corporate veil. The court ruled that arbitrators lack jurisdiction to lift corporate veils as their authority is limited to parties who consented to arbitration. While courts possess power to pierce corporate veils in appropriate cases, arbitral tribunals cannot extend proceedings to include non-consenting parties outside the arbitration agreement&#039;s scope. The petition was allowed and the award was set aside regarding the petitioner&#039;s liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457696</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>