https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457699 SC dismissed appeals filed by appellants challenging HC's rejection of their leave to appeal application. Court held appellants lacked locus standi as they were neither parties to original suit nor aggrieved persons under Sections 96 and 100 CPC. The trial court decree cancelling agreement to sell did not prejudicially affect appellants' rights based on separate sale deeds executed under general power of attorney. Since judgment was not in rem and only binding between original parties, appellants failed to demonstrate they were adversely affected or had legal rights jeopardized to qualify as aggrieved persons entitled to appeal. en-us Fri, 21 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Sep 2024 23:06:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457699 SC dismissed appeals filed by appellants challenging HC's rejection of their leave to appeal application. Court held appellants lacked locus standi as they were neither parties to original suit nor aggrieved persons under Sections 96 and 100 CPC. The trial court decree cancelling agreement to sell did not prejudicially affect appellants' rights based on separate sale deeds executed under general power of attorney. Since judgment was not in rem and only binding between original parties, appellants failed to demonstrate they were adversely affected or had legal rights jeopardized to qualify as aggrieved persons entitled to appeal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 21 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457699