<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (9) TMI 717 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457682</link>
    <description>Ex parte adjudication under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 may be set aside where the notice and hearing process is disputed and the factual foundation requires reconsideration. The appellant contended that the show cause notice and hearing notice were not served at the correct address, and the record indicated import-related documents, including the bill of entry and customs duty payment, that supported fresh examination of the matter. On that basis, the adjudication order imposing penalty for alleged violation of section 8(3) read with section 8(4) was quashed and the matter remanded for fresh adjudication on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2024 18:44:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=770497" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (9) TMI 717 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457682</link>
      <description>Ex parte adjudication under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 may be set aside where the notice and hearing process is disputed and the factual foundation requires reconsideration. The appellant contended that the show cause notice and hearing notice were not served at the correct address, and the record indicated import-related documents, including the bill of entry and customs duty payment, that supported fresh examination of the matter. On that basis, the adjudication order imposing penalty for alleged violation of section 8(3) read with section 8(4) was quashed and the matter remanded for fresh adjudication on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457682</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>