<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (9) TMI 717 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457682</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange in New Delhi overturned a Rs. 18,10,000 penalty against the appellant for violating the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973. The Tribunal determined that the appellant did not receive necessary communications due to an incorrect address and remanded the case for fresh adjudication. The Rs. 1,81,000 pre-deposit is to be refunded, and the matter must be resolved within 90 days.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2024 18:44:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=770497" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (9) TMI 717 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457682</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange in New Delhi overturned a Rs. 18,10,000 penalty against the appellant for violating the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973. The Tribunal determined that the appellant did not receive necessary communications due to an incorrect address and remanded the case for fresh adjudication. The Rs. 1,81,000 pre-deposit is to be refunded, and the matter must be resolved within 90 days.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457682</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>