<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 780 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457684</link>
    <description>The Appellate Authority allowed the appeal, quashing the adjudication order imposing a penalty for alleged contravention of FERA provisions. The appellant successfully clarified the discrepancy in the remittance amount through a bank letter, despite failing to submit evidence for the import of goods. The penalty was thus set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2024 18:44:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=770495" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 780 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457684</link>
      <description>The Appellate Authority allowed the appeal, quashing the adjudication order imposing a penalty for alleged contravention of FERA provisions. The appellant successfully clarified the discrepancy in the remittance amount through a bank letter, despite failing to submit evidence for the import of goods. The penalty was thus set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457684</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>