<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 779 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457685</link>
    <description>A voluntary confessional statement, even if later retracted, may be relied upon in foreign exchange proceedings where the retraction is unsupported by evidence of inducement, threat, coercion, or other improper means. The tribunal also found that denial of one cross-examination request and alleged non-supply of relied upon documents did not vitiate the adjudication because no prejudice was shown and the appellant&#039;s own confession constituted independent material. On that basis, the finding of contravention was sustained, the penalty order was upheld, and the appeal failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2024 18:44:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=770494" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 779 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457685</link>
      <description>A voluntary confessional statement, even if later retracted, may be relied upon in foreign exchange proceedings where the retraction is unsupported by evidence of inducement, threat, coercion, or other improper means. The tribunal also found that denial of one cross-examination request and alleged non-supply of relied upon documents did not vitiate the adjudication because no prejudice was shown and the appellant&#039;s own confession constituted independent material. On that basis, the finding of contravention was sustained, the penalty order was upheld, and the appeal failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457685</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>