<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 707 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457687</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, quashing the penalty against the partner but upholding it against the partnership firm for failing to repatriate export proceeds under FERA, 1973. The Tribunal found the penalty amount reasonable and granted the firm 60 days to deposit the remaining penalty, allowing respondents to recover if unpaid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2024 18:44:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=770492" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 707 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457687</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, quashing the penalty against the partner but upholding it against the partnership firm for failing to repatriate export proceeds under FERA, 1973. The Tribunal found the penalty amount reasonable and granted the firm 60 days to deposit the remaining penalty, allowing respondents to recover if unpaid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457687</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>