<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (5) TMI 626 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457688</link>
    <description>The appellate authority allowed the appeals, setting aside the impugned findings and penalty orders under FERA, 1973. The appellants successfully argued that they had taken reasonable steps to realize export proceeds, and the adjudicating officer&#039;s failure to consider all relevant correspondence constituted a denial of natural justice. Consequently, the penalties were revoked.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2024 18:44:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=770491" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (5) TMI 626 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457688</link>
      <description>The appellate authority allowed the appeals, setting aside the impugned findings and penalty orders under FERA, 1973. The appellants successfully argued that they had taken reasonable steps to realize export proceeds, and the adjudicating officer&#039;s failure to consider all relevant correspondence constituted a denial of natural justice. Consequently, the penalties were revoked.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457688</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>