<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (4) TMI 667 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457689</link>
    <description>The appeals concerning violations of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973, were resolved with the Adjudicating Officer confirming contraventions by the appellants. The penalties for Teja Singh were reduced by 50% due to their disproportionate nature, while those for Dilip Kundu were upheld. The decision underscored the necessity for clear evidence and proportionate penalties in quasi-criminal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2024 18:44:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=770490" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (4) TMI 667 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457689</link>
      <description>The appeals concerning violations of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973, were resolved with the Adjudicating Officer confirming contraventions by the appellants. The penalties for Teja Singh were reduced by 50% due to their disproportionate nature, while those for Dilip Kundu were upheld. The decision underscored the necessity for clear evidence and proportionate penalties in quasi-criminal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457689</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>