<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (10) TMI 9 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38503</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled that kitchen expenses incurred by the firm were subject to the limits set by section 37(2A) of the Income-tax Act, considering them akin to entertainment expenditure. However, receipts from Gaushala and Dharmada accounts were not considered income of the firm, as the majority of the amount was spent on charitable purposes. The court favored the firm on this issue, leading to no order as to costs due to the divided success of the parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 17:22:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=77049" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (10) TMI 9 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38503</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled that kitchen expenses incurred by the firm were subject to the limits set by section 37(2A) of the Income-tax Act, considering them akin to entertainment expenditure. However, receipts from Gaushala and Dharmada accounts were not considered income of the firm, as the majority of the amount was spent on charitable purposes. The court favored the firm on this issue, leading to no order as to costs due to the divided success of the parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38503</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>