<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (4) TMI 12 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38497</link>
    <description>A sub-partnership formed by a partner in a licensed liquor business, solely to finance that partner&#039;s share and apportion the resulting profits and losses, is not illegal under the Abkari law merely because the main business is liquor trade. The sub-partnership remains an arrangement inter se and does not make the sub-partners partners in the main firm. Its validity and eligibility for registration under the Income-tax Act depend on its genuineness and legal existence, not on later sharing of beneficial income. The prohibition in the Abkari law applies only where the sub-partnership itself carries on liquor business without the necessary licence or permission. On the stated facts, the sub-partnerships were valid and entitled to registration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 17:10:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=77043" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (4) TMI 12 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38497</link>
      <description>A sub-partnership formed by a partner in a licensed liquor business, solely to finance that partner&#039;s share and apportion the resulting profits and losses, is not illegal under the Abkari law merely because the main business is liquor trade. The sub-partnership remains an arrangement inter se and does not make the sub-partners partners in the main firm. Its validity and eligibility for registration under the Income-tax Act depend on its genuineness and legal existence, not on later sharing of beneficial income. The prohibition in the Abkari law applies only where the sub-partnership itself carries on liquor business without the necessary licence or permission. On the stated facts, the sub-partnerships were valid and entitled to registration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38497</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>