<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 752 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457670</link>
    <description>A valid extension granted by the Reserve Bank of India for repatriation of export proceeds prevents a contravention from arising for the extended period. Because the extension letters covered the export proceeds in question and extended time up to 28 January 2006, the statutory obligation under section 18(2) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 could not be treated as breached during that period. The adjudication orders, which proceeded on an assumed violation despite the extension, lacked legal basis and were set aside. The appeals accordingly succeeded and the impugned orders were quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2024 15:20:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=770415" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 752 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457670</link>
      <description>A valid extension granted by the Reserve Bank of India for repatriation of export proceeds prevents a contravention from arising for the extended period. Because the extension letters covered the export proceeds in question and extended time up to 28 January 2006, the statutory obligation under section 18(2) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 could not be treated as breached during that period. The adjudication orders, which proceeded on an assumed violation despite the extension, lacked legal basis and were set aside. The appeals accordingly succeeded and the impugned orders were quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457670</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>