<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (12) TMI 21 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38494</link>
    <description>The court held that the tax challan, order under section 210, and notice of demand under section 156 were invalid due to lack of proper signatures. Consequently, the petitioner was not obligated to pay interest under sections 217(1A) and 220(2). The court ordered the petitioner to pay the reduced tax liability, with a third party directed to remit the sum with interest to the Income-tax Officer. The petitioner was also liable to pay interest on the said sum from a specified date. No costs were awarded in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 17:05:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=77040" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (12) TMI 21 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38494</link>
      <description>The court held that the tax challan, order under section 210, and notice of demand under section 156 were invalid due to lack of proper signatures. Consequently, the petitioner was not obligated to pay interest under sections 217(1A) and 220(2). The court ordered the petitioner to pay the reduced tax liability, with a third party directed to remit the sum with interest to the Income-tax Officer. The petitioner was also liable to pay interest on the said sum from a specified date. No costs were awarded in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38494</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>