<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Dismisses Petition for Fresh Vote; Directs Parties to Seek Remedy Through NCLT for Resolution Plan Issues.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81667</link>
    <description>Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking initiation of fresh voting on petitioner&#039;s Resolution Plan after considering principles of equality and fairness dismissed. Court held petitioner has efficacious remedy to assail CoC&#039;s action before NCLT as Adjudicating Authority has jurisdiction to regulate CoC&#039;s conduct, adjudicate upon resolution plan through judicial review, ensuring CoC functions per IBC. NCLT maintains supervisory role over CIRP proceedings u/s 60 of IBC. Court cannot usurp NCLT&#039;s powers to inquire into CoC&#039;s commercial wisdom rejecting petitioner&#039;s plan. Petitioner&#039;s offer to match successful bidder&#039;s offer cannot be entertained by Court. NCLT may allow open court bidding if deemed fit while considering CoC&#039;s decision. Petitioner granted liberty to approach NCLT to decide objections on merits per law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2024 08:01:36 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2024 08:01:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=770309" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Dismisses Petition for Fresh Vote; Directs Parties to Seek Remedy Through NCLT for Resolution Plan Issues.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81667</link>
      <description>Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking initiation of fresh voting on petitioner&#039;s Resolution Plan after considering principles of equality and fairness dismissed. Court held petitioner has efficacious remedy to assail CoC&#039;s action before NCLT as Adjudicating Authority has jurisdiction to regulate CoC&#039;s conduct, adjudicate upon resolution plan through judicial review, ensuring CoC functions per IBC. NCLT maintains supervisory role over CIRP proceedings u/s 60 of IBC. Court cannot usurp NCLT&#039;s powers to inquire into CoC&#039;s commercial wisdom rejecting petitioner&#039;s plan. Petitioner&#039;s offer to match successful bidder&#039;s offer cannot be entertained by Court. NCLT may allow open court bidding if deemed fit while considering CoC&#039;s decision. Petitioner granted liberty to approach NCLT to decide objections on merits per law.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2024 08:01:36 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81667</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>