<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Cash seized - Can&#039;t be used for appeal deposits; Excess interest on seized cash FDs to be refunded.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81665</link>
    <description>Cash seized during investigation cannot be appropriated towards pre-deposits u/s 35FF of Central Excise Act or Section 129EE of Customs Act as a condition for filing appeals. Respondents erroneously granted interest at 6% per annum on refund of seized cash deposited in fixed deposits earning higher interest. Petitioner&#039;s claim for 18% interest rejected, but entitled to excess interest earned on fixed deposits over 6%. Respondents, as trustees, obligated to account for entire interest earned and cannot enrich themselves. Impugned order quashed, petitioner awarded excess interest of Rs. 90,07,829/- over 6% on fixed deposits from seized cash. Respondents to initiate inquiry, fix responsibility for negligence in non-renewal of fixed deposits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2024 08:01:36 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2024 08:01:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=770307" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Cash seized - Can&#039;t be used for appeal deposits; Excess interest on seized cash FDs to be refunded.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81665</link>
      <description>Cash seized during investigation cannot be appropriated towards pre-deposits u/s 35FF of Central Excise Act or Section 129EE of Customs Act as a condition for filing appeals. Respondents erroneously granted interest at 6% per annum on refund of seized cash deposited in fixed deposits earning higher interest. Petitioner&#039;s claim for 18% interest rejected, but entitled to excess interest earned on fixed deposits over 6%. Respondents, as trustees, obligated to account for entire interest earned and cannot enrich themselves. Impugned order quashed, petitioner awarded excess interest of Rs. 90,07,829/- over 6% on fixed deposits from seized cash. Respondents to initiate inquiry, fix responsibility for negligence in non-renewal of fixed deposits.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2024 08:01:36 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81665</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>