https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759141 SC declined to interfere with the High Court's confirmation of the ITAT's remand for fresh consideration, leaving the remand order intact and allowing the matter to proceed in accordance with that remand. On the Vivad se Vishwas settlement issue, the petitioner, having already availed the scheme for AY 2013-2014, was permitted to apply for the same remedy for AY 2009-2010 and AY 2014-2015. The authorities were directed to process any such applications under the prescribed procedure and dispose of them expeditiously. Delay was condoned, and the SLPs were disposed of accordingly. en-us Mon, 02 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 Oct 2024 16:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759141 SC declined to interfere with the High Court's confirmation of the ITAT's remand for fresh consideration, leaving the remand order intact and allowing the matter to proceed in accordance with that remand. On the Vivad se Vishwas settlement issue, the petitioner, having already availed the scheme for AY 2013-2014, was permitted to apply for the same remedy for AY 2009-2010 and AY 2014-2015. The authorities were directed to process any such applications under the prescribed procedure and dispose of them expeditiously. Delay was condoned, and the SLPs were disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 02 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759141