https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759142 An appeal under section 260A challenging a bogus LTCG assessment was rejected for want of any substantial question of law, with the Tribunal's order affirming the CIT(A) left undisturbed and the stay application also dismissed. The Supreme Court thereafter dismissed the special leave petition. The note reflects the limited appellate scope under section 260A and the court's refusal to reopen the matter where no substantial legal question was shown, including objections relating to fresh evidence, reliance on regulatory adjudication, and application of precedent in share-trading related tax assessments. en-us Fri, 20 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Apr 2026 11:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759142 An appeal under section 260A challenging a bogus LTCG assessment was rejected for want of any substantial question of law, with the Tribunal's order affirming the CIT(A) left undisturbed and the stay application also dismissed. The Supreme Court thereafter dismissed the special leave petition. The note reflects the limited appellate scope under section 260A and the court's refusal to reopen the matter where no substantial legal question was shown, including objections relating to fresh evidence, reliance on regulatory adjudication, and application of precedent in share-trading related tax assessments. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 20 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759142