https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759142 Validity of an appeal under section 260A was examined in relation to alleged bogus long-term capital gains, the existence of a substantial question of law, and the scope of appellate jurisdiction. The issues included the binding effect of coordinate-bench decisions, admission of fresh evidence in appellate proceedings, reliance on regulatory adjudication in income-tax assessments, and application of precedent to share-trading assessments. The High Court had dismissed the appeal for want of a substantial question of law, leaving the Tribunal's affirmation of the appellate order intact. The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition and the stay application. en-us Fri, 20 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Apr 2026 11:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759142 Validity of an appeal under section 260A was examined in relation to alleged bogus long-term capital gains, the existence of a substantial question of law, and the scope of appellate jurisdiction. The issues included the binding effect of coordinate-bench decisions, admission of fresh evidence in appellate proceedings, reliance on regulatory adjudication in income-tax assessments, and application of precedent to share-trading assessments. The High Court had dismissed the appeal for want of a substantial question of law, leaving the Tribunal's affirmation of the appellate order intact. The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition and the stay application. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 20 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759142