<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (3) TMI 15 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38481</link>
    <description>For development rebate under section 34(3)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the prescribed portion must be carried to a distinct reserve account and kept subject to the statutory restrictions on use. A credit in a renewals and replacement account, maintained under a separate arrangement allowing business utilisation, was examined against that requirement and was not treated as equivalent to a reserve account merely because it held an amount above the minimum required deposit. The discussion distinguishes cases relied on by the revenue and concludes that such an account does not, by itself, satisfy the statutory reserve condition for allowance of the rebate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 15:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=77027" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (3) TMI 15 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38481</link>
      <description>For development rebate under section 34(3)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the prescribed portion must be carried to a distinct reserve account and kept subject to the statutory restrictions on use. A credit in a renewals and replacement account, maintained under a separate arrangement allowing business utilisation, was examined against that requirement and was not treated as equivalent to a reserve account merely because it held an amount above the minimum required deposit. The discussion distinguishes cases relied on by the revenue and concludes that such an account does not, by itself, satisfy the statutory reserve condition for allowance of the rebate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38481</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>