<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1389 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759145</link>
    <description>The HC set aside a bank attachment order and remanded the matter for fresh consideration after finding violation of natural justice principles. The petitioner, who had shifted business location and failed to update authorized representative details under GST regime, was unaware of show cause notices served on their previous auditor. The court held the department at fault for the petitioner&#039;s lack of awareness of proceedings and inability to respond. Relief was granted subject to payment of 7.5% of disputed tax within four weeks. The petition was allowed by way of remand for fresh consideration by the first respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 May 2025 21:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=770268" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1389 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759145</link>
      <description>The HC set aside a bank attachment order and remanded the matter for fresh consideration after finding violation of natural justice principles. The petitioner, who had shifted business location and failed to update authorized representative details under GST regime, was unaware of show cause notices served on their previous auditor. The court held the department at fault for the petitioner&#039;s lack of awareness of proceedings and inability to respond. Relief was granted subject to payment of 7.5% of disputed tax within four weeks. The petition was allowed by way of remand for fresh consideration by the first respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759145</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>