<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1394 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759150</link>
    <description>Karnataka HC allowed petition challenging audit and intimation liability orders under Section 65 of CGST Act, 2017 for financial years 2018-19 and 2019-20. Court held that since Resolution Plan was already approved by NCLT, the impugned orders and proceedings were without jurisdiction or authority of law. The orders were quashed as they lacked legal basis following NCLT&#039;s approval of the resolution plan.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 May 2025 18:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=770263" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1394 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759150</link>
      <description>Karnataka HC allowed petition challenging audit and intimation liability orders under Section 65 of CGST Act, 2017 for financial years 2018-19 and 2019-20. Court held that since Resolution Plan was already approved by NCLT, the impugned orders and proceedings were without jurisdiction or authority of law. The orders were quashed as they lacked legal basis following NCLT&#039;s approval of the resolution plan.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759150</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>