https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457621 In a Section 11 petition under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the Delhi High Court held that disputes under maintenance agreements could be referred to arbitration where the developer, though a non-signatory, was directly connected to the composite commercial arrangement. The maintenance agency's authority derived from the developer's agreement, and the unit owners' maintenance contracts expressly incorporated that arrangement, making the agreements inextricably linked. On that prima facie basis, the Court treated the developer as bound by the arbitration arrangement and referred the dispute to arbitration with a sole arbitrator appointed. The Court also stated that objections on jurisdiction and arbitrability could still be raised before the arbitral tribunal. en-us Mon, 17 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Oct 2024 13:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457621 In a Section 11 petition under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the Delhi High Court held that disputes under maintenance agreements could be referred to arbitration where the developer, though a non-signatory, was directly connected to the composite commercial arrangement. The maintenance agency's authority derived from the developer's agreement, and the unit owners' maintenance contracts expressly incorporated that arrangement, making the agreements inextricably linked. On that prima facie basis, the Court treated the developer as bound by the arbitration arrangement and referred the dispute to arbitration with a sole arbitrator appointed. The Court also stated that objections on jurisdiction and arbitrability could still be raised before the arbitral tribunal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 17 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457621