https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457622 A broad arbitration clause covering disputes arising out of or in connection with the contracts supported appointment of an arbitrator when the contractual mechanism failed after notice, so Section 11(6) was attracted. The Court also accepted that a non-signatory could be brought into the arbitral reference where the pleaded facts showed direct involvement in the transaction and justified lifting the corporate veil for the limited purpose of constituting the tribunal. The applications were allowed, and the arbitral process was set in motion against both respondents, including the second respondent. en-us Tue, 27 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 Sep 2024 19:51:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457622 A broad arbitration clause covering disputes arising out of or in connection with the contracts supported appointment of an arbitrator when the contractual mechanism failed after notice, so Section 11(6) was attracted. The Court also accepted that a non-signatory could be brought into the arbitral reference where the pleaded facts showed direct involvement in the transaction and justified lifting the corporate veil for the limited purpose of constituting the tribunal. The applications were allowed, and the arbitral process was set in motion against both respondents, including the second respondent. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 27 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457622