<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 2183 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457623</link>
    <description>Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act bars civil court jurisdiction over matters within the Debts Recovery Tribunal&#039;s or Appellate Tribunal&#039;s powers, including challenges to enforcement measures under Section 13(4). A suit framed as a partition action remains barred where its effect is to obstruct SARFAESI enforcement. The statutory remedies before the Debts Recovery Tribunal and, where necessary, the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal provide the prescribed route for aggrieved parties. The Act&#039;s overriding effect reinforces this exclusion of civil jurisdiction. Civil suits were closed, the auction sale was maintained, and objections could be pursued before the Debts Recovery Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2024 19:51:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=770242" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 2183 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457623</link>
      <description>Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act bars civil court jurisdiction over matters within the Debts Recovery Tribunal&#039;s or Appellate Tribunal&#039;s powers, including challenges to enforcement measures under Section 13(4). A suit framed as a partition action remains barred where its effect is to obstruct SARFAESI enforcement. The statutory remedies before the Debts Recovery Tribunal and, where necessary, the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal provide the prescribed route for aggrieved parties. The Act&#039;s overriding effect reinforces this exclusion of civil jurisdiction. Civil suits were closed, the auction sale was maintained, and objections could be pursued before the Debts Recovery Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457623</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>