<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 1527 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457636</link>
    <description>The Karnataka HC allowed the appeal, remanding the case to the Assessing Authority to evaluate the applicability of Section 35D of the IT Act for amortization of expenses related to business extension. The court emphasized that statutory relief should not be denied on technical grounds, leaving all contentions open and awarding no costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2024 19:51:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=770229" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 1527 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457636</link>
      <description>The Karnataka HC allowed the appeal, remanding the case to the Assessing Authority to evaluate the applicability of Section 35D of the IT Act for amortization of expenses related to business extension. The court emphasized that statutory relief should not be denied on technical grounds, leaving all contentions open and awarding no costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457636</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>