https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457607 Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 saves only the portion of an accused's information that distinctly relates to a fact discovered in consequence of that information. The Court held that disclosures leading to facts not previously known to police, including the identification and arrest of a co-accused, recovery of forged currency notes, and further exposure of the counterfeit currency network, were admissible. Sections 25 and 26 barred the confessional parts, but the discovery-based portion remained usable. The recoveries and corroborative evidence therefore sustained the prosecution case, and the convictions were upheld. en-us Tue, 27 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Jun 2026 17:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457607 Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 saves only the portion of an accused's information that distinctly relates to a fact discovered in consequence of that information. The Court held that disclosures leading to facts not previously known to police, including the identification and arrest of a co-accused, recovery of forged currency notes, and further exposure of the counterfeit currency network, were admissible. Sections 25 and 26 barred the confessional parts, but the discovery-based portion remained usable. The recoveries and corroborative evidence therefore sustained the prosecution case, and the convictions were upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 27 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457607