https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759079 Section 60(5)(c) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 is a residuary jurisdictional provision confined to questions arising out of or in relation to the insolvency process, and it does not extend to disputes that are independent of insolvency or governed by another statutory regime. Where the challenge concerns pre-CIRP closure and transfer notices under the Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, the Adjudicating Authority lacks jurisdiction to examine their legality. On that basis, workmen's post-closure wage and bonus claims could not be reopened as a challenge to the closure itself, and the admitted claim determination was not shown to require interference. en-us Fri, 20 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Sep 2024 18:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759079 Section 60(5)(c) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 is a residuary jurisdictional provision confined to questions arising out of or in relation to the insolvency process, and it does not extend to disputes that are independent of insolvency or governed by another statutory regime. Where the challenge concerns pre-CIRP closure and transfer notices under the Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, the Adjudicating Authority lacks jurisdiction to examine their legality. On that basis, workmen's post-closure wage and bonus claims could not be reopened as a challenge to the closure itself, and the admitted claim determination was not shown to require interference. Case-Laws IBC Fri, 20 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759079