<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1324 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759080</link>
    <description>Electricity supply treated as a critical input during CIRP remains protected only if current dues are paid; the amended Section 14 scheme of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 makes non-payment a valid ground for disconnection or other lawful coercive steps despite the moratorium. The Explanation to Section 14(1) preserves licences and similar benefits subject to payment of current dues, while Section 14(2-A) extends protection to essential supplies needed to keep the corporate debtor as a going concern but expressly excludes unpaid moratorium-period dues. The earlier view treating disconnection as barred by moratorium was said to be inconsistent with this statutory scheme.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2024 09:05:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=770091" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1324 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759080</link>
      <description>Electricity supply treated as a critical input during CIRP remains protected only if current dues are paid; the amended Section 14 scheme of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 makes non-payment a valid ground for disconnection or other lawful coercive steps despite the moratorium. The Explanation to Section 14(1) preserves licences and similar benefits subject to payment of current dues, while Section 14(2-A) extends protection to essential supplies needed to keep the corporate debtor as a going concern but expressly excludes unpaid moratorium-period dues. The earlier view treating disconnection as barred by moratorium was said to be inconsistent with this statutory scheme.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759080</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>