<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1327 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759083</link>
    <description>CESTAT Ahmedabad allowed appeal by remand in customs valuation dispute involving misdeclaration and misclassification of imported goods. Tribunal held that proper valuation determination requires sequential application of Customs Valuation Rules and rejection of legally unacceptable methods. Department failed to provide contemporaneous price data and import documents to appellant, while relying on rival company director&#039;s statement without supporting import data or allowing cross-examination. Some protein-containing products required detailed consideration for classification under T.H 21069099. Matter remanded to adjudicating authority for fresh consideration with proper opportunity and relevant documentation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2024 13:17:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=770088" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1327 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759083</link>
      <description>CESTAT Ahmedabad allowed appeal by remand in customs valuation dispute involving misdeclaration and misclassification of imported goods. Tribunal held that proper valuation determination requires sequential application of Customs Valuation Rules and rejection of legally unacceptable methods. Department failed to provide contemporaneous price data and import documents to appellant, while relying on rival company director&#039;s statement without supporting import data or allowing cross-examination. Some protein-containing products required detailed consideration for classification under T.H 21069099. Matter remanded to adjudicating authority for fresh consideration with proper opportunity and relevant documentation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759083</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>