<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1330 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759086</link>
    <description>The ITAT Chennai held that reassessment u/s 147 was invalid where the AO reopened assessment to examine capital gains on land sale but instead made transfer pricing adjustments without addressing the original reason for reopening. The tribunal ruled that while Section 147 permits assessing other escaped income discovered during reassessment proceedings, this can only occur if the primary escaped income that triggered the Section 148 notice is first assessed. Since the AO failed to examine the capital gains issue that formed the basis for reopening and instead made unrelated TP adjustments, the reassessment order was quashed on jurisdictional grounds. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2024 09:05:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=770085" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1330 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759086</link>
      <description>The ITAT Chennai held that reassessment u/s 147 was invalid where the AO reopened assessment to examine capital gains on land sale but instead made transfer pricing adjustments without addressing the original reason for reopening. The tribunal ruled that while Section 147 permits assessing other escaped income discovered during reassessment proceedings, this can only occur if the primary escaped income that triggered the Section 148 notice is first assessed. Since the AO failed to examine the capital gains issue that formed the basis for reopening and instead made unrelated TP adjustments, the reassessment order was quashed on jurisdictional grounds. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759086</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>