<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1345 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759101</link>
    <description>SC allowed writ petition challenging GST demand for incorrect input tax credit. Court found petitioner rectified credit within statutory timeline, considered them an honest taxpayer, and set aside the demand order. The 1st respondent was directed to issue fresh orders within three months, with no time limit restrictions under assessment completion notifications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 May 2025 21:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=770070" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1345 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759101</link>
      <description>SC allowed writ petition challenging GST demand for incorrect input tax credit. Court found petitioner rectified credit within statutory timeline, considered them an honest taxpayer, and set aside the demand order. The 1st respondent was directed to issue fresh orders within three months, with no time limit restrictions under assessment completion notifications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759101</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>