<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1348 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759104</link>
    <description>HC of AP resolved a complex insolvency case involving a company&#039;s tax liability post-resolution plan. The court upheld NCLT&#039;s order, finding that claims not part of the resolution plan were extinguished. Applying Section 238 of IBC, the court determined that the resolution plan overrides other laws, including GST Act. The writ petitions were allowed, setting aside tax demand orders while permitting fresh assessments for periods not covered by the NCLT order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 May 2025 18:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=770067" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1348 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759104</link>
      <description>HC of AP resolved a complex insolvency case involving a company&#039;s tax liability post-resolution plan. The court upheld NCLT&#039;s order, finding that claims not part of the resolution plan were extinguished. Applying Section 238 of IBC, the court determined that the resolution plan overrides other laws, including GST Act. The writ petitions were allowed, setting aside tax demand orders while permitting fresh assessments for periods not covered by the NCLT order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759104</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>