<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (2) TMI 11 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38460</link>
    <description>Income-tax recovery required the certificate to be forwarded to the Collector within the statutory period; absent proof of timely forwarding, recovery proceedings were time-barred and the Collector lacked jurisdiction. Revenue sale procedures required service of demand, attachment notice and publication, and a sale notice stating the time, place and conditions of sale. Failure to prove demand service, Gazette publication of attachment, and proper sale proclamation and publication invalidated the sale. A challenge to the sale accrued on the sale or its confirmation, rather than the earlier demand; a suit instituted before confirmation was therefore not time-barred. The assessment&#039;s validity remained undecided, while injunctive relief against recovery and sale was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 13:24:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=77006" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (2) TMI 11 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38460</link>
      <description>Income-tax recovery required the certificate to be forwarded to the Collector within the statutory period; absent proof of timely forwarding, recovery proceedings were time-barred and the Collector lacked jurisdiction. Revenue sale procedures required service of demand, attachment notice and publication, and a sale notice stating the time, place and conditions of sale. Failure to prove demand service, Gazette publication of attachment, and proper sale proclamation and publication invalidated the sale. A challenge to the sale accrued on the sale or its confirmation, rather than the earlier demand; a suit instituted before confirmation was therefore not time-barred. The assessment&#039;s validity remained undecided, while injunctive relief against recovery and sale was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38460</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>