https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457589 Mandatory arbitration clauses requiring disputes over interpretation and implementation of a lease deed to be referred to arbitration remain valid despite a separate clause conferring court jurisdiction, where that clause identifies the supervisory forum rather than an alternative to arbitration. Clauses addressing particular lessor or lessee claims do not create an impermissible split in arbitrability where the arbitration agreement operates mutually and is not curtailed by those provisions. Landlord-tenant disputes of this nature are arbitrable. At the arbitrator-appointment stage, courts take a prima facie view, interpret contractual language to uphold arbitration, and ordinarily resolve doubts in favour of reference, while leaving jurisdictional and validity objections to the arbitral tribunal. en-us Thu, 23 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Sep 2024 20:31:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457589 Mandatory arbitration clauses requiring disputes over interpretation and implementation of a lease deed to be referred to arbitration remain valid despite a separate clause conferring court jurisdiction, where that clause identifies the supervisory forum rather than an alternative to arbitration. Clauses addressing particular lessor or lessee claims do not create an impermissible split in arbitrability where the arbitration agreement operates mutually and is not curtailed by those provisions. Landlord-tenant disputes of this nature are arbitrable. At the arbitrator-appointment stage, courts take a prima facie view, interpret contractual language to uphold arbitration, and ordinarily resolve doubts in favour of reference, while leaving jurisdictional and validity objections to the arbitral tribunal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 23 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457589