<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Arbitral award upholds public policy; Gita Power jointly liable with OPG; Limitation period extended by acknowledgment.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81639</link>
    <description>Arbitral award does not conflict with public policy of India or vitiate by patent illegality. Gita Power justifiably subjected to arbitration and jointly liable with OPG. Enexio&#039;s claim indivisible, limitation governed by Article 55 not Articles 14, 18 and 113. Claim matured on 19 March 2016, limitation extended by acknowledgment on 19 April 2018 u/s 18. Counterclaims except gear boxes/fan modules within limitation. Rejection of prayer to declare debit notes invalid had no adverse impact. No palpable error in award to term &#039;patently illegal&#039; or in conflict with public policy. Division Bench rightly set aside Single Judge order restoring arbitral award. Appeal dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2024 18:49:19 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2024 18:49:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=770023" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Arbitral award upholds public policy; Gita Power jointly liable with OPG; Limitation period extended by acknowledgment.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81639</link>
      <description>Arbitral award does not conflict with public policy of India or vitiate by patent illegality. Gita Power justifiably subjected to arbitration and jointly liable with OPG. Enexio&#039;s claim indivisible, limitation governed by Article 55 not Articles 14, 18 and 113. Claim matured on 19 March 2016, limitation extended by acknowledgment on 19 April 2018 u/s 18. Counterclaims except gear boxes/fan modules within limitation. Rejection of prayer to declare debit notes invalid had no adverse impact. No palpable error in award to term &#039;patently illegal&#039; or in conflict with public policy. Division Bench rightly set aside Single Judge order restoring arbitral award. Appeal dismissed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2024 18:49:19 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81639</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>