<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1299 - Supreme Court (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759055</link>
    <description>Under Section 11, the referral court&#039;s enquiry is confined to the existence of an arbitration agreement, but in cases involving a non-signatory it may prima facie assess whether that party is a veritable party to the agreement. A non-signatory can be bound where its conduct, participation and relationship with the signatories show consent to the underlying contract and its arbitration clause, including through negotiation, performance, implementation and interdependent transactions. Because the SRG Group&#039;s alleged role, the surrounding communications and the relevant contractual clauses raised disputed factual questions, the court treated the issue as unsuitable for a mini-trial at the referral stage and left it to the arbitral tribunal under competence-competence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2024 11:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=770021" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1299 - Supreme Court (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759055</link>
      <description>Under Section 11, the referral court&#039;s enquiry is confined to the existence of an arbitration agreement, but in cases involving a non-signatory it may prima facie assess whether that party is a veritable party to the agreement. A non-signatory can be bound where its conduct, participation and relationship with the signatories show consent to the underlying contract and its arbitration clause, including through negotiation, performance, implementation and interdependent transactions. Because the SRG Group&#039;s alleged role, the surrounding communications and the relevant contractual clauses raised disputed factual questions, the court treated the issue as unsuitable for a mini-trial at the referral stage and left it to the arbitral tribunal under competence-competence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759055</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>