<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (11) TMI 26 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38455</link>
    <description>Where a firm has been discontinued or dissolved, the Income-tax Act fastens joint and several liability on every person who was a partner at the time of discontinuance or dissolution for the firm&#039;s tax or penalty dues. The Kerala High Court distinguished the Full Bench ruling relied on by the petitioner and held that this statutory liability is not displaced by the fact that the assessment stood in the firm&#039;s name or by later notices issued under the new Act for advance-tax demand. On that basis, prohibitory orders securing recovery of the firm&#039;s arrears were upheld and the request for refund relief under article 226 could not succeed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 13:15:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=77001" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (11) TMI 26 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38455</link>
      <description>Where a firm has been discontinued or dissolved, the Income-tax Act fastens joint and several liability on every person who was a partner at the time of discontinuance or dissolution for the firm&#039;s tax or penalty dues. The Kerala High Court distinguished the Full Bench ruling relied on by the petitioner and held that this statutory liability is not displaced by the fact that the assessment stood in the firm&#039;s name or by later notices issued under the new Act for advance-tax demand. On that basis, prohibitory orders securing recovery of the firm&#039;s arrears were upheld and the request for refund relief under article 226 could not succeed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38455</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>