<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 728 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457561</link>
    <description>Conditional dispensation from the full pre-deposit requirement under section 52(2) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act was made subject to deposit of 10% of the penalty and furnishing of an unconditional bank guarantee within time. The appellants failed to comply with those conditions, did not appear consistently, and showed no bona fide effort to satisfy the order. On that basis, the Tribunal treated the non-compliance as a total violation of its interim direction and held that no equity remained in favour of the appellants, so the appeals were not maintainable and were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2024 17:23:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=769980" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 728 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457561</link>
      <description>Conditional dispensation from the full pre-deposit requirement under section 52(2) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act was made subject to deposit of 10% of the penalty and furnishing of an unconditional bank guarantee within time. The appellants failed to comply with those conditions, did not appear consistently, and showed no bona fide effort to satisfy the order. On that basis, the Tribunal treated the non-compliance as a total violation of its interim direction and held that no equity remained in favour of the appellants, so the appeals were not maintainable and were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457561</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>