<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 729 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457562</link>
    <description>Foreign exchange contravention may be established where receipt of a foreign currency cheque, paid for by a non-resident, is accompanied by no credible evidence that it was a genuine gift based on natural love and affection. Facts concerning the transaction&#039;s source and legitimacy, being especially within the recipient&#039;s knowledge, place the burden of explanation on that recipient. An unsupported explanation may justify an adverse inference when corroborated by surrounding circumstances and a co-noticee&#039;s statement. Differential treatment of another person does not invalidate a lawful adjudication, as negative equality is unavailable. The contravention and resulting penalty were sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2024 17:23:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=769979" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 729 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457562</link>
      <description>Foreign exchange contravention may be established where receipt of a foreign currency cheque, paid for by a non-resident, is accompanied by no credible evidence that it was a genuine gift based on natural love and affection. Facts concerning the transaction&#039;s source and legitimacy, being especially within the recipient&#039;s knowledge, place the burden of explanation on that recipient. An unsupported explanation may justify an adverse inference when corroborated by surrounding circumstances and a co-noticee&#039;s statement. Differential treatment of another person does not invalidate a lawful adjudication, as negative equality is unavailable. The contravention and resulting penalty were sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457562</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>