<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (10) TMI 525 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457565</link>
    <description>A penalty for contravention of section 8(1) and section 8(2) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 was upheld where the appellant admitted unauthorized purchase and sale of foreign exchange at rates other than those prescribed by the RBI. The later retraction was delayed and unsupported by material showing coercion or inducement. The confession was corroborated by recovery of foreign currency and documents from a person found in the appellant&#039;s premises, together with that person&#039;s statement. A retracted confession may be relied on when it appears true and receives assurance from other evidence, and no satisfactory basis was shown to discard the adjudication findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2024 17:23:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=769976" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (10) TMI 525 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457565</link>
      <description>A penalty for contravention of section 8(1) and section 8(2) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 was upheld where the appellant admitted unauthorized purchase and sale of foreign exchange at rates other than those prescribed by the RBI. The later retraction was delayed and unsupported by material showing coercion or inducement. The confession was corroborated by recovery of foreign currency and documents from a person found in the appellant&#039;s premises, together with that person&#039;s statement. A retracted confession may be relied on when it appears true and receives assurance from other evidence, and no satisfactory basis was shown to discard the adjudication findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457565</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>