https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457552 A repealed foreign exchange law continued to govern an appeal arising from proceedings initiated and concluded under that statute because the saving provisions preserved its operation for pending offences and proceedings. The appellate remedy therefore remained subject to the repealed Act's own limitation scheme, under which an appeal had to be filed within forty-five days and could be condoned only up to ninety days on sufficient cause. The later enactment could not be invoked to enlarge that outer limit. An appeal filed beyond ninety days was accordingly barred by limitation and not entertainable. en-us Fri, 28 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Sep 2024 14:56:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457552 A repealed foreign exchange law continued to govern an appeal arising from proceedings initiated and concluded under that statute because the saving provisions preserved its operation for pending offences and proceedings. The appellate remedy therefore remained subject to the repealed Act's own limitation scheme, under which an appeal had to be filed within forty-five days and could be condoned only up to ninety days on sufficient cause. The later enactment could not be invoked to enlarge that outer limit. An appeal filed beyond ninety days was accordingly barred by limitation and not entertainable. Case-Laws FEMA Fri, 28 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457552