<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Dismisses Jurisdictional Challenge to GST Show Cause Notice; State Officer&#039;s Authority Upheld for Interstate Dealings.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81633</link>
    <description>The Court rejected the petitioner&#039;s challenge to the show cause notice (SCN) issued u/s 74 of the CGST Act on jurisdictional grounds. The petitioner failed to submit a reply to the SCN, which emanated from a GST audit report after examining records for specific periods. The objection regarding the officer&#039;s lack of jurisdiction over the petitioner&#039;s business in other States was misconceived. The Court held that officers appointed u/ss 4, 5, and 6 of the CGST Act have the same powers, and a State GST Officer is authorized as a proper officer under the Act. Once an SCN is issued by a State GST Officer, no other officer from another State can initiate proceedings regarding tax evasion, wrongful input tax credit, or other issues u/s 74. The Cha.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2024 09:10:19 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2024 09:10:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=769876" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Dismisses Jurisdictional Challenge to GST Show Cause Notice; State Officer&#039;s Authority Upheld for Interstate Dealings.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81633</link>
      <description>The Court rejected the petitioner&#039;s challenge to the show cause notice (SCN) issued u/s 74 of the CGST Act on jurisdictional grounds. The petitioner failed to submit a reply to the SCN, which emanated from a GST audit report after examining records for specific periods. The objection regarding the officer&#039;s lack of jurisdiction over the petitioner&#039;s business in other States was misconceived. The Court held that officers appointed u/ss 4, 5, and 6 of the CGST Act have the same powers, and a State GST Officer is authorized as a proper officer under the Act. Once an SCN is issued by a State GST Officer, no other officer from another State can initiate proceedings regarding tax evasion, wrongful input tax credit, or other issues u/s 74. The Cha.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2024 09:10:19 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81633</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>