<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1247 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759003</link>
    <description>Finality of an earlier Tribunal order barred the Revenue from reopening the respondent&#039;s entitlement to Notification No. 33/99-CE for a period substantially covered by that order. The same issue had already been decided in the respondent&#039;s favour and had attained finality because no further challenge was pursued. A later show-cause notice and appeal sought to re-agitate the identical controversy for substantially the same period, which was not permissible. The principle of finality and judicial discipline prevented the Revenue from taking a contrary stand on an issue already concluded, so the challenge to the notification benefit failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2024 09:10:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=769834" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1247 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759003</link>
      <description>Finality of an earlier Tribunal order barred the Revenue from reopening the respondent&#039;s entitlement to Notification No. 33/99-CE for a period substantially covered by that order. The same issue had already been decided in the respondent&#039;s favour and had attained finality because no further challenge was pursued. A later show-cause notice and appeal sought to re-agitate the identical controversy for substantially the same period, which was not permissible. The principle of finality and judicial discipline prevented the Revenue from taking a contrary stand on an issue already concluded, so the challenge to the notification benefit failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759003</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>