<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1285 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759041</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed a review petition filed under Section 114 read with Order XLVII Rule 1 of CPC, 1908. The petitioner sought review claiming mistake apparent on record, arguing the issue wasn&#039;t covered by a previous judgment. However, the HC noted the impugned order was passed in presence of counsel without objection, and since the order was appealable, no mistake apparent on record existed warranting review. The petition lacked merit and was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 May 2025 21:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=769796" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1285 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759041</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed a review petition filed under Section 114 read with Order XLVII Rule 1 of CPC, 1908. The petitioner sought review claiming mistake apparent on record, arguing the issue wasn&#039;t covered by a previous judgment. However, the HC noted the impugned order was passed in presence of counsel without objection, and since the order was appealable, no mistake apparent on record existed warranting review. The petition lacked merit and was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759041</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>