<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1286 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759042</link>
    <description>HC granted petition challenging GST-related asset freezing. Court quashed five attachment orders against petitioner&#039;s demat accounts due to lack of prior notice. State representative acknowledged procedural irregularity and undertook to defreeze accounts by specified date. Depository participants were directed to be informed about order, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 May 2025 21:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=769795" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1286 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759042</link>
      <description>HC granted petition challenging GST-related asset freezing. Court quashed five attachment orders against petitioner&#039;s demat accounts due to lack of prior notice. State representative acknowledged procedural irregularity and undertook to defreeze accounts by specified date. Depository participants were directed to be informed about order, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759042</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>