https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759044 HC dismissed writ petition challenging constitutional validity of Section 29(2) of CGST Act and BGST Act regarding time limitation for appeals against registration cancellation. Petitioner failed to pursue statutory remedies within prescribed timeframe and raised constitutional challenge only after delay. Court found no valid grounds to exercise discretionary powers under Article 226, noting Section 30 provides revocation mechanism within thirty days. Orders were passed within statutory boundaries, and constitutional validity challenge was rejected as petitioner did not exhaust available statutory remedies. en-us Thu, 29 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 May 2025 20:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759044 HC dismissed writ petition challenging constitutional validity of Section 29(2) of CGST Act and BGST Act regarding time limitation for appeals against registration cancellation. Petitioner failed to pursue statutory remedies within prescribed timeframe and raised constitutional challenge only after delay. Court found no valid grounds to exercise discretionary powers under Article 226, noting Section 30 provides revocation mechanism within thirty days. Orders were passed within statutory boundaries, and constitutional validity challenge was rejected as petitioner did not exhaust available statutory remedies. Case-Laws GST Thu, 29 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759044