<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 1458 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457518</link>
    <description>Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act authorises the District Magistrate to assist a secured creditor in taking possession after measures under Section 13(4). This function is ministerial, executory and non-adjudicatory: the District Magistrate verifies the affidavit and statutory preconditions but need not give the borrower prior notice or a hearing. Section 14(3) protects actions taken pursuant to such assistance from challenge before courts or authorities. Where borrowers had received the Section 13(2) notice and knew of the enforcement measures, absence of separate notice under Section 14 does not invalidate the possession-assistance order. A challenge to that order therefore fails, making the limitation issue before the Tribunal immaterial.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Sep 2024 07:19:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=769780" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 1458 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457518</link>
      <description>Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act authorises the District Magistrate to assist a secured creditor in taking possession after measures under Section 13(4). This function is ministerial, executory and non-adjudicatory: the District Magistrate verifies the affidavit and statutory preconditions but need not give the borrower prior notice or a hearing. Section 14(3) protects actions taken pursuant to such assistance from challenge before courts or authorities. Where borrowers had received the Section 13(2) notice and knew of the enforcement measures, absence of separate notice under Section 14 does not invalidate the possession-assistance order. A challenge to that order therefore fails, making the limitation issue before the Tribunal immaterial.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457518</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>