<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 1317 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457522</link>
    <description>The Bombay HC granted an ad-interim ex-parte restraining order against defendants infringing plaintiff&#039;s copyright and engaging in passing off activities. Plaintiff, registered owner of domain utiitsl.com, demonstrated statutory and common law rights being violated by unknown entities operating fraudulent websites imitating plaintiff&#039;s marks and services. The court found defendants&#039; conduct illegal, noting irreparable damage from continued fake website operations and threats to confidential data. Given impossibility of tracking all defendants for service and ongoing harm, the court issued restraining orders without service, protecting plaintiff&#039;s exclusive copyright and domain rights.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Sep 2024 07:19:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=769776" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 1317 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457522</link>
      <description>The Bombay HC granted an ad-interim ex-parte restraining order against defendants infringing plaintiff&#039;s copyright and engaging in passing off activities. Plaintiff, registered owner of domain utiitsl.com, demonstrated statutory and common law rights being violated by unknown entities operating fraudulent websites imitating plaintiff&#039;s marks and services. The court found defendants&#039; conduct illegal, noting irreparable damage from continued fake website operations and threats to confidential data. Given impossibility of tracking all defendants for service and ongoing harm, the court issued restraining orders without service, protecting plaintiff&#039;s exclusive copyright and domain rights.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457522</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>