<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 1455 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457526</link>
    <description>CESTAT Chandigarh allowed the application for restoration of appeal and condoned the delay in filing the restoration application. The applicant had complied with pre-deposit conditions under the stay order dated 04.06.2012. The tribunal found no challenge to the stay order, only to the dismissal order. The registry was directed to restore the appeal to its original number and list it for final disposal on 06.01.2022, noting the appeal pertained to 2010.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Sep 2024 07:19:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=769772" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 1455 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457526</link>
      <description>CESTAT Chandigarh allowed the application for restoration of appeal and condoned the delay in filing the restoration application. The applicant had complied with pre-deposit conditions under the stay order dated 04.06.2012. The tribunal found no challenge to the stay order, only to the dismissal order. The registry was directed to restore the appeal to its original number and list it for final disposal on 06.01.2022, noting the appeal pertained to 2010.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457526</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>